TY - JOUR
T1 - Parameters of the fluid core resonance inferred from superconducting gravimeter data
AU - Sato, Tadahiro
AU - Tamura, Yoshiaki
AU - Matsumoto, Koji
AU - Imanishi, Yuichi
AU - McQueen, Herbert
PY - 2004/10
Y1 - 2004/10
N2 - We have estimated the parameters of fluid core resonance (FCR) due to the nearly diurnal free wobble of the Earth's core based on the superconducting gravimeter (SG) data obtained at the following four observation sites; Esashi and Matsushiro in Japan, Canberra in Australia and Membach in Belgium. By fitting the tidal admittances normalized with the O1 wave at each site to a model of the damped harmonic oscillator, we obtained values of 429.66 ± 1.43 sidereal days, 9350-10,835, -4.828E-4 ± 3.4E-6, -3.0E-5 ± 4.5E-6 for the eigenperiod, the Q-value and the real and imaginary parts of the resonance strength, respectively. Our values obtained from only using the gravity data are very consistent with those inferred from the VLBI nutation data. Our study strongly indicates that the systematic difference between two estimations from the gravity and the nutation in particular for the Q-value, which has been shown in previous works, is mainly caused by the inaccurate correction for the ocean tide effects. The error in the ocean tide correction is discussed based on the comparison among four global ocean tide models; Schwiderski model (1980), NAO.99b (Matsumoto et al., 2000), CSR4.0 (Eanes and Bettadpur, 1994) and GOT99.2b (Ray, 1999).
AB - We have estimated the parameters of fluid core resonance (FCR) due to the nearly diurnal free wobble of the Earth's core based on the superconducting gravimeter (SG) data obtained at the following four observation sites; Esashi and Matsushiro in Japan, Canberra in Australia and Membach in Belgium. By fitting the tidal admittances normalized with the O1 wave at each site to a model of the damped harmonic oscillator, we obtained values of 429.66 ± 1.43 sidereal days, 9350-10,835, -4.828E-4 ± 3.4E-6, -3.0E-5 ± 4.5E-6 for the eigenperiod, the Q-value and the real and imaginary parts of the resonance strength, respectively. Our values obtained from only using the gravity data are very consistent with those inferred from the VLBI nutation data. Our study strongly indicates that the systematic difference between two estimations from the gravity and the nutation in particular for the Q-value, which has been shown in previous works, is mainly caused by the inaccurate correction for the ocean tide effects. The error in the ocean tide correction is discussed based on the comparison among four global ocean tide models; Schwiderski model (1980), NAO.99b (Matsumoto et al., 2000), CSR4.0 (Eanes and Bettadpur, 1994) and GOT99.2b (Ray, 1999).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8744316825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jog.2004.07.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jog.2004.07.016
M3 - Article
SN - 0264-3707
VL - 38
SP - 375
EP - 389
JO - Journal of Geodynamics
JF - Journal of Geodynamics
IS - 3-5 SPEC.ISS.
ER -