Parents' nonstandard work schedules and child well-being: A critical review of the literature

Jianghong Li*, Sarah E. Johnson, Wen Jui Han, Sonia Andrews, Garth Kendall, Lyndall Strazdins, Alfred Dockery

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    124 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper provides a comprehensive review of empirical evidence linking parental nonstandard work schedules to four main child developmental outcomes: internalizing and externalizing problems, cognitive development, and body mass index. We evaluated the studies based on theory and methodological rigor (longitudinal data, representative samples, consideration of selection and information bias, confounders, moderators, and mediators). Of 23 studies published between 1980 and 2012 that met the selection criteria, 21 reported significant associations between nonstandard work schedules and an adverse child developmental outcome. The associations were partially mediated through parental depressive symptoms, low quality parenting, reduced parent-child interaction and closeness, and a less supportive home environment. These associations were more pronounced in disadvantaged families and when parents worked such schedules full time. We discuss the nuance, strengths, and limitations of the existing studies, and propose recommendations for future research.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)53-73
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of Primary Prevention
    Volume35
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Parents' nonstandard work schedules and child well-being: A critical review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this