TY - JOUR
T1 - Park Rangers and Science-Public Expertise
T2 - Science as Care in Biosecurity for Kauri Trees in Aotearoa/New Zealand
AU - McEntee, Marie
AU - Medvecky, Fabien
AU - MacBride-Stewart, Sara
AU - Macknight, Vicki
AU - Martin, Michael
N1 - © The Author(s) 2023
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Park rangers hold a unique set of knowledge-of science, of publics, of institutional structures, of place, and of self-that should be recognised as valuable. For too long, models of the knowledge of scientists and publics have set people like rangers in an inbetweener position, seeing them as good at communicating, translating or negotiating from one side to the other, but not as making knowledge that is powerful in its own right. In this paper we argue that focus groups with park rangers across regional and conservation parks in Aotearoa/New Zealand reveal the complexity and multiplicity of rangers' knowledge-making that shows the science-public model as incomplete. We argue further that the model is flawed for its focus on the making and holding of knowledge and not also on how it is enacted. Rangers, we argue, are responsible every day for making knowledgeable decisions for the health and well-being of parks and people. Making good decisions, though, requires not just knowledge but also care. An understanding of the many ways rangers know and enact their knowledge is important for biosecurity practice, especially in models of adaptive governance.
AB - Park rangers hold a unique set of knowledge-of science, of publics, of institutional structures, of place, and of self-that should be recognised as valuable. For too long, models of the knowledge of scientists and publics have set people like rangers in an inbetweener position, seeing them as good at communicating, translating or negotiating from one side to the other, but not as making knowledge that is powerful in its own right. In this paper we argue that focus groups with park rangers across regional and conservation parks in Aotearoa/New Zealand reveal the complexity and multiplicity of rangers' knowledge-making that shows the science-public model as incomplete. We argue further that the model is flawed for its focus on the making and holding of knowledge and not also on how it is enacted. Rangers, we argue, are responsible every day for making knowledgeable decisions for the health and well-being of parks and people. Making good decisions, though, requires not just knowledge but also care. An understanding of the many ways rangers know and enact their knowledge is important for biosecurity practice, especially in models of adaptive governance.
KW - Adaptive governance
KW - Biosecurity
KW - Care
KW - Expertise
KW - Kauri dieback
KW - Rangers
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=anu_research_portal_plus2&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000909430000001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1007/s11024-022-09482-9
DO - 10.1007/s11024-022-09482-9
M3 - Article
SN - 0026-4695
VL - 61
SP - 117
EP - 140
JO - Minerva
JF - Minerva
IS - 1
ER -