Parliament and patronage

Edward Aspinall*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

    56 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Analysing the 9 April 2014 legislative elections in Indonesia, this article presents a case study of patronage politics in an open-list proportional-representation electoral system. Under this system, candidates focus on increasing their personal vote rather than votes for their party. Most candidates did so in the 2014 elections by relying on personal brokerage networks rather than party machines. They also distributed material rewards—including individual gifts, club goods, and pork barrel projects—to voters, and engaged in straightforward vote buying. The paper concludes by suggesting that, in order to move beyond clientelism, Indonesia needs to explore options for electoral reform.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)96-110
    Number of pages15
    JournalJournal of Democracy
    Volume25
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Parliament and patronage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this