Parole, politics and penal policy

Lorana Bartels, Arie Freiberg, Robin Fitzgerald, Shannon Dodd

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article examines the most recent changes in Australian parole laws, policies and practices in the context of the changing relations between legislatures, the courts and parole authorities. It argues that legislatures, purportedly reflecting public opinion, have become less willing to trust either the courts or parole boards and have eroded their authority, powers and discretion. It provides examples of legislative changes that have altered the purposes of parole and introduced mandatory or presumptive non-parole periods, as well as overriding, by-passing and restricting parole.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)26
    JournalQUT Law Review (University of Queensland Law Review)
    Volume18
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Parole, politics and penal policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this