Participating doctors’ perspectives on the regulation of voluntary assisted dying in Victoria: a qualitative study

Lindy Willmott*, Ben P. White, Marcus Sellars, Patsy M. Yates

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives: To investigate the perspectives of doctors involved with voluntary assisted dying in Victoria regarding the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 (Vic) and its operation. Design, setting, participants: Qualitative study; semi-structured interviews with 32 doctors who had participated in the voluntary assisted dying system during its first year of operation (commenced 19 June 2019). Doctors were interviewed during April‒July 2020. Results: Three major themes related to problems during the first year of operation of the Act were identified: the statutory prohibition of health professionals initiating discussions with their patients about voluntary assisted dying; the Department of Health and Human Services guidance requirement that all doctor‒patient, doctor‒pharmacist, and pharmacist‒patient interactions be face-to-face; and aspects of implementation, including problems with the voluntary assisted dying online portal, obtaining documentary evidence to establish eligibility, and inadequate resourcing of the Statewide Pharmacy Service. Conclusions: Doctors reported only limited concerns about the Victorian voluntary assisted dying legislation, but have had some problems with its operation, including implications for the accessibility of voluntary assisted dying to eligible patients. While legislative change may resolve some of these concerns, most can be ameliorated by improving the processes and systems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)125-129
    Number of pages5
    JournalMedical Journal of Australia
    Volume215
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Aug 2021

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Participating doctors’ perspectives on the regulation of voluntary assisted dying in Victoria: a qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this