Participation and Constitutionalism

Peter Cane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This essay addresses two related questions: is participation by citizens in administrative decision-making constitutionally regulated? And if so, to what extent and in what circumstances? Obviously, answers to these questions may vary from one constitutional system to another. The limited aim of the essay is briefly to survey some of those answers and suggest how they might be explained. I will not attempt to state comprehensively the relevant law of any jurisdiction, but I will draw illustrations and examples from several. Nor (for reasons of space) will I tackle any of the underlying theoretical, empirical and practical questions about the functions, effects, costs and benefits of participation and its constitutional regulation. Nevertheless, the essay's modest objective is worth pursuing in order to provide a clear analytical framework for consideration of such questions. Much of the very large literature on participation does not expressly advert to its constitutional regulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-334
JournalFederal Law Review
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Participation and Constitutionalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this