Abstract
It is common to distinguish moral rules, reasons, or values that are agent-relative fromthose that are agent-neutral.Onecanalso distinguish moral rules, reasons, or values that are moment-relative from those that are moment-neutral. In this article, I introduce a third distinction that stands alongside these two distinctions- the distinction between moral rules, reasons, or values that are patient-relative and those that are patient-neutral. I then show how patient-relativity plays an important role in several moral theories, gives us a better understanding of agentrelativity and moment-relativity, and provides a novel objection to Derek Parfit’s "appeal to full relativity" argument.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6-26 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Ethics |
| Volume | 127 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2016 |