Patterns of use of hormone replacement therapy in one million women in Britain, 1996-2000

Simon Abbott, Emma Bailey, Krys Baker, Emily Banks, Isobel Barnes, Angela Balkwill, Valerie Beral, Judith Black, Kate Bonner, Anna Brown, Diana Bull, Andrea Burrile, Becky Cameron, Judith Clarke, Andrea Cliff, Barbara Crossley, Jane Dee, David Eastwood, Dave Ewart, Laura GerrardJane Green, Elizabeth Hilton, Ann Hogg, Joy Hooley, Anna Hurst, Carol Keene, Caroline Kennedy, Nicky Langston, Christine Lewis, Joanne Mathie, Karen Pennington, Gillian Reeves, Simon Reid, Brian Roden, Emma Sherman, Moya Simmonds, Elizabeth Spencer, Alison Timadjer, Steve Warby, Joan Austoker, Ruth English, Julietta Patnick, Richard Peto, Martin Vessey, Matthew Wallis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe national patterns of use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in 1996-2000. Design: Population-based study of women aged 50-64. Setting: England and Scotland. Population: A total of 1,091,250 women were recruited between May 1996 and December 2000. Methods: Women invited for screening at 66 NHS breast screening units were sent a questionnaire to complete before they were screened; 71% of women screened participated. Main outcome measures: Prevalence of use of HRT. Results: Overall, 33% of women reported that they were currently using HRT, the average duration of use being 5.8 years; 50% were ever-users. Current use of HRT was about twice as common at age 50-54 than 60-64, but varied little by time or region, the prevalences being 33%-34% in each year from 1996 to 2000; 30% in Scotland and 35% in southeast England. The prevalence of current use of HRT varied substantially depending on the woman's history of gynaecological surgery and past health, and was as follows in women with a history of: bilateral oophorectomy (66%); hysterectomy without bilateral oophorectomy (48%); neither hysterectomy nor bilateral oophorectomy (27%); breast cancer (6%); other cancer (25%); stroke (24%); venous thromboembolism (24%); diabetes (25%); heart disease (31%); or hypertension (31%). There was considerably less variation in the prevalence of use of HRT according to deprivation index, education, parity, body mass index, exercise, smoking or alcohol consumption. Conclusions: HRT is currently used by around one-third of women aged 50-64 in Britain and appears to be influenced considerably more strongly by a woman's medical and surgical history than by socio-economic or lifestyle factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1319-1330
Number of pages12
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume109
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patterns of use of hormone replacement therapy in one million women in Britain, 1996-2000'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this