TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of density functional theory procedures for the calculation of proton-exchange barriers
T2 - Unusual behavior of M06-type functionals
AU - Chan, Bun
AU - Gilbert, Andrew T.B.
AU - Gill, Peter M.W.
AU - Radom, Leo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2014/9/9
Y1 - 2014/9/9
N2 - We have examined the performance of a variety of density functional theory procedures for the calculation of complexation energies and proton-exchange barriers, with a focus on the Minnesota-class of functionals that are generally highly robust and generally show good accuracy. A curious observation is that M05-type and M06-type methods show an atypical decrease in calculated barriers with increasing proportion of Hartree-Fock exchange. To obtain a clearer picture of the performance of the underlying components of M05-type and M06-type functionals, we have investigated the combination of MPW-type and PBE-type exchange and B95-type and PBE-type correlation procedures. We find that, for the extensive E3 test set, the general performance of the various hybrid-DFT procedures improves in the following order: PBE1-B95 → PBE1-PBE → MPW1-PBE → PW6-B95. As M05-type and M06-type procedures are related to PBE1-B95, it would be of interest to formulate and examine the general performance of an alternative Minnesota DFT method related to PW6-B95.
AB - We have examined the performance of a variety of density functional theory procedures for the calculation of complexation energies and proton-exchange barriers, with a focus on the Minnesota-class of functionals that are generally highly robust and generally show good accuracy. A curious observation is that M05-type and M06-type methods show an atypical decrease in calculated barriers with increasing proportion of Hartree-Fock exchange. To obtain a clearer picture of the performance of the underlying components of M05-type and M06-type functionals, we have investigated the combination of MPW-type and PBE-type exchange and B95-type and PBE-type correlation procedures. We find that, for the extensive E3 test set, the general performance of the various hybrid-DFT procedures improves in the following order: PBE1-B95 → PBE1-PBE → MPW1-PBE → PW6-B95. As M05-type and M06-type procedures are related to PBE1-B95, it would be of interest to formulate and examine the general performance of an alternative Minnesota DFT method related to PW6-B95.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907164287&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/ct500506t
DO - 10.1021/ct500506t
M3 - Article
SN - 1549-9618
VL - 10
SP - 3777
EP - 3783
JO - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
JF - Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
IS - 9
ER -