Performance of student software development teams: the influence of personality and identifying as team members

Conal Monaghan*, Boris Bizumic, Katherine Reynolds, Michael Smithson, Lynette Johns-Boast, Dirk van Rooy

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    One prominent approach in the exploration of the variations in project team performance has been to study two components of the aggregate personalities of the team members: conscientiousness and agreeableness. A second line of research, known as self-categorisation theory, argues that identifying as team members and the team's performance norms should substantially influence the team's performance. This paper explores the influence of both these perspectives in university software engineering project teams. Eighty students worked to complete a piece of software in small project teams during 2007 or 2008. To reduce limitations in statistical analysis, Monte Carlo simulation techniques were employed to extrapolate from the results of the original sample to a larger simulated sample (2043 cases, within 319 teams). The results emphasise the importance of taking into account personality (particularly conscientiousness), and both team identification and the team's norm of performance, in order to cultivate higher levels of performance in student software engineering project teams.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)52-67
    Number of pages16
    JournalEuropean Journal of Engineering Education
    Volume40
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of student software development teams: the influence of personality and identifying as team members'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this