Perils and positives of science journalism in Australia

Merryn McKinnon*, Johanna Howes, Andrew Leach, Natasha Prokop

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Scientists, science communicators and science journalists interact to deliver science news to the public. Yet the value of interactions between the groups in delivering high-quality science stories is poorly understood within Australia. A recent study in New Zealand on the perspectives of the three groups on the challenges facing science journalism is replicated here in the context of New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. While all three groups perceived the quality of science journalism as generally high, the limitations of non-specialists and public relation materials were causes for concern. The results indicate that science communicators are considered to play a valuable role as facilitators of information flow to journalists and support for scientists. Future studies on the influence and implications of interactions between these three groups are required.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)562-577
    Number of pages16
    JournalPublic Understanding of Science
    Volume27
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Perils and positives of science journalism in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this