Abstract
Savulescu (forthcoming) argues that it may be ethically acceptable for governments to require citizens be vaccinated against COVID-19. He also recommends that governments consider providing monetary or in-kind incentives to citizens to increase vaccination rates. In this response, we argue against mandatory vaccination and vaccine incentivisation, and instead suggest that targeted public health messaging and a greater responsiveness to the concerns of vaccine-hesitant individuals would be the best strategy to address low vaccination rates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 709-711 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Journal of Medical Ethics |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Persuasion, not coercion or incentivisation, is the best means of promoting COVID-19 vaccination'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver