Perverting the course of politics

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Lawyers talk of the common law offence of 'perverting the course of justice' by bribing or intimidating judges or jurors, lying to the police or court, concealing or destroying or fabricating evidence. This article argues that the same things are wrong, and wrong for the same reasons, politically as judicially: they prevent people from knowing and applying for themselves the rules by which they are ruled. The sort of excuses typically offered for those perverse practices in politics - that 'it made no difference', that 'they could and should have resisted' or that it is merely a matter of 'fair adversarial competition' - would be laughed out of a court of law, and they should be shunned politically for the same reasons as judicially.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)725-739
    Number of pages15
    JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
    Volume40
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Perverting the course of politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this