Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pharmaceutical care increases time in therapeutic range of patients with poor quality of anticoagulation with warfarin

  • Leiliane Rodrigues Marcatto
  • , Luciana Sacilotto
  • , Letícia Camargo Tavares
  • , Mirella Facin
  • , Natália Olivetti
  • , Celia Maria Cassaro Strunz
  • , Francisco Carlos Costa Darrieux
  • , Maurício Ibrahim Scanavacca
  • , Jose Eduardo Krieger
  • , Alexandre Costa Pereira
  • , Paulo Caleb Lima Santos*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Thromboembolic events are associated with high mortality and morbidity indexes. In this context, warfarin is the most widely prescribed oral anticoagulant agent for preventing and treating these events. This medication has a narrow therapeutic range and, consequently, patients usually have difficulty in achieving and maintaining stable target therapeutics. Some studies on the literature about oral anticoagulant management showed that pharmacists could improve the efficiency of anticoagulant therapy. However, the majority of these studies included general patients retrospectively. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate a pharmacist’s warfarin management in patients with poor quality of anticoagulation therapy (Time in the Therapeutic Range- TTR < 50%). We included 268 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and without stable dose of warfarin (TTR < 50%, based on the last three values of International Normalized Ratio-INR). We followed them up for 12 weeks, INR values were evaluated and, when necessary, the dose adjustments were performed. During the first four visits, patient’s INR was measured every 7 days. Then, if INR was within the target therapeutic range (INR: 2–3), the patient was asked to return in 30 days. However, if INR was out the therapeutic target, the patient was asked to return in 7 days. Adherence evaluation was measured through questionnaires and by counting the pills taken. Comparison between basal TTR (which was calculated based on the three last INR values before prospective phase) and TTR of 4 weeks (calculated by considering the INR tests from visits 0 to 4, in the prospective phase of the study) and basal TTR and TTR of 12 weeks (calculated based on the INR tests from visits 0 to 12, in the prospective phase of the study) revealed significant statistical differences (0.144 ± 0.010 vs. 0.382 ± 0.016; and 0.144 ± 0.010 vs. 0.543 ± 0.014, p < 0.001, respectively). We also observed that the mean TTR of 1 year before (retrospective phase) was lower than TTR value after 12 weeks of pharmacist-driven treatment (prospective phase) (0.320 ± 0.015; 0.540 ± 0.015, p < 0.001). In conclusion, pharmaceutical care was able to improve TTR values in patients with AF and poor quality of anticoagulation with warfarin.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1052
Number of pages8
JournalFrontiers in Pharmacology
Volume9
Issue numberSEP
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Sept 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pharmaceutical care increases time in therapeutic range of patients with poor quality of anticoagulation with warfarin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this