TY - CHAP
T1 - PhD education in science
T2 - Producing the scientific mindset in biomedical sciences
AU - Pearson, Margot
AU - Cowan, Anna
AU - Liston, Adrian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2009 David Boud and Alison Lee, selection and editorial matter; individual chapters, the contributors All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/1/1
Y1 - 2009/1/1
N2 - The increasing number of PhD students, and the interest in research and knowledge production as a significant factor in innovation in post-industrial economies, have led to greater interest in ensuring that doctoral education is of high quality and relevant to contemporary needs (Denholm and Evans, 2007; Enders, 2004). Tensions are evident, however, as those responsible for doctoral education face competing pressures: to broaden the curriculum; to prepare students for variable career outcomes; and to do so more efficiently, that is within reduced timeframes. In this chapter we argue that these tensions can best be addressed in science doctoral education by focusing on both a doctoral curriculum and pedagogical practices that recognise the need for producing doctoral graduates who have the higher order skills of analysis and ability to make a scientific assessment of data and do this creatively, an approach which constitutes a scientific mindset. Graduates with a scientific mindset have the capacity for independence and innovation in research. They can identify and formulate responses to novel and complex questions and problems. This is in contrast to a ‘super-technician’ who is technically proficient but has limited capacity to initiate significant research activity. It is the former who are better equipped to adapt to varying work contexts inside and outside academia.
AB - The increasing number of PhD students, and the interest in research and knowledge production as a significant factor in innovation in post-industrial economies, have led to greater interest in ensuring that doctoral education is of high quality and relevant to contemporary needs (Denholm and Evans, 2007; Enders, 2004). Tensions are evident, however, as those responsible for doctoral education face competing pressures: to broaden the curriculum; to prepare students for variable career outcomes; and to do so more efficiently, that is within reduced timeframes. In this chapter we argue that these tensions can best be addressed in science doctoral education by focusing on both a doctoral curriculum and pedagogical practices that recognise the need for producing doctoral graduates who have the higher order skills of analysis and ability to make a scientific assessment of data and do this creatively, an approach which constitutes a scientific mindset. Graduates with a scientific mindset have the capacity for independence and innovation in research. They can identify and formulate responses to novel and complex questions and problems. This is in contrast to a ‘super-technician’ who is technically proficient but has limited capacity to initiate significant research activity. It is the former who are better equipped to adapt to varying work contexts inside and outside academia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952420909&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4324/9780203870488-15
DO - 10.4324/9780203870488-15
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9780203870488
SP - 100
EP - 112
BT - Changing Practices of Doctoral Education
PB - Taylor and Francis
ER -