Phylogeographic lineages and species comparisons in conservation analyses: A case study of California herpetofauna

Leslie J. Rissler*, Robert J. Hijmans, Catherine H. Graham, Craig Moritz, David B. Wake

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

170 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many phylogeographic studies have revealed strongly diverged lineages within species that are masked by a lack of congruent morphological differentiation. To assess the extent to which the genetic component of diversity affects conservation assessments, we compared spatial patterns of endemism and conservation value for 22 species of Californian amphibians and reptiles with the 75 phylogeographic lineages that they contain. We used bioclimatic distribution modeling with environmental layers to generate 5-km spatial-resolution maps of predicted distribution for each species and lineage. We found concentrations of lineage breaks across the Central Valley, San Francisco Bay, the Sierra Nevada, and the Tehachapi and Trinity ranges. Subdivision of the ranges of species into phylogeographic units revealed novel areas of endemism. Several areas of very high conservation value for lineages were not evident in the species-level analysis. These observations illustrate the importance of considering multiple levels of biodiversity in conservation assessments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)655-666
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume167
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phylogeographic lineages and species comparisons in conservation analyses: A case study of California herpetofauna'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this