Planets, pluralism, and conceptual lineage

Carl Brusse*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Conceptual change can occur for a variety of reasons; some more scientifically significant than others. The 2006 definition of 'planet', which saw Pluto reclassified as a dwarf planet, is an example toward the more mundane end of the scale. I argue however that this case serves as a useful example of a related phenomenon, whereby what appears to be a single kind term conceals two or more distinct concepts with independent scientific utility. I examine the historical background to this case, as a template for developing additional evidence for pluralist approaches to conceptual disputes within science and elsewhere.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)93-106
    Number of pages14
    JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
    Volume53
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Planets, pluralism, and conceptual lineage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this