Policing communal spaces: A reconfiguration of the 'mass private property' hypothesis

Michael Kempa*, Philip Stenning, Jennifer Wood

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    89 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Explanations for developments in state and non-state policing include the influence of globalization/late-modernity (Reiner 1992; Sheptycki 1995), shifts in political rationalities (O'Malley and Palmer 1996; O'Malley 1997), the rise of 'mass private property' (Shearing and Stenning 1981; 1983), and the decline of secondary social controls (Jones and Newburn 2002). Responding positively to recent critiques of the mass private property hypothesis raised by Jones and Newburn (1998; 1999a), we argue that shifts in policing can be tied to the resurgence of many new forms of 'communal space' (von Hirsch and Shearing 2000; Hermer et al. 2002) of which mass private property is only one example. We then induce a framework suggestive of the links between the extant accounts of trends in policing.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)562-581
    Number of pages20
    JournalBritish Journal of Criminology
    Volume44
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Policing communal spaces: A reconfiguration of the 'mass private property' hypothesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this