Political regimes, business cycles, seasonalities, and returns

John G. Powell, Jing Shi, Tom Smith, Robert E. Whaley*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper provides a method for testing for regime differences when regimes are long-lasting. Standard testing procedures are generally inappropriate because regime persistence causes a spurious regression problem - a problem that has led to incorrect inference in a broad range of studies involving regimes representing political, business, and seasonal cycles. The paper outlines analytically how standard estimators can be adjusted for regime dummy variable persistence. While the adjustments are helpful asymptotically, spurious regression remains a problem in small samples and must be addressed using simulation or bootstrap procedures. We provide a simulation procedure for testing hypotheses in situations where an independent variable in a time-series regression is a persistent regime dummy variable. We also develop a procedure for testing hypotheses in situations where the dependent variable has similar properties.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1112-1128
    Number of pages17
    JournalJournal of Banking and Finance
    Volume33
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Political regimes, business cycles, seasonalities, and returns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this