Abstract
While there is considerable research on elected legislators in a variety of contexts, the academic knowledge about their advisors is very limited. This is surprising, given a considerable portion of work attributed to legislators is performed by political staff. Further, political advising increasingly serves as a training ground for future politicians in many professionalised legislatures. We use a mixed-methods approach to understand how the influence of men and women differs in political advising positions in the case of Canada's House of Commons, and how this may affect women's political ambition. We demonstrate while close to an equal number of men and women work for MPs in a political capacity on Parliament Hill, men continue to dominate legislative roles while women continue to dominate administrative roles. Further, legislative work increases political ambition, which means more men benefit from the socialising effects of legislative work than women.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 616-637 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Parliamentary Affairs |
Volume | 72 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2019 |