Politicians and Professionalization in the Pacific Islands: Revisiting Self-Regulation?

Jack Corbett*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this article, I examine the nature of political practice in the Pacific Islands against two dominant measures of professionalization: incentive and institutionalist. Drawing from a range of qualitative data-interviews with politicians, published life histories, and observation-from across the region, I find that professionalization is largely unapparent against these measures. However, despite the likelihood that this absence will continue, the professional politician continues to be a standard against which political leadership in the Pacific is assessed, and thus poses a significant problem for would-be-reformers. In response to this dilemma, I find that the older idea of self-regulating professional ethics, usually disregarded by proponents of these newer and more managerial measures, has more to offer than might first appear.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)852-876
    Number of pages25
    JournalPolitics and Policy
    Volume41
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Politicians and Professionalization in the Pacific Islands: Revisiting Self-Regulation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this