TY - JOUR
T1 - Politicians' Theories of Voting Behavior
AU - Lucas, Jack
AU - Sheffer, Lior
AU - Loewen, Peter John
AU - Walgrave, Stefaan
AU - Soontjens, Karolin
AU - Amsalem, Eran
AU - Bailer, Stefanie
AU - Brack, Nathalie
AU - Breunig, Christian
AU - Bundi, Pirmin
AU - Coufal, Linda
AU - Dumont, Patrick
AU - Lachance, Sarah
AU - Pereira, Miguel M.
AU - Persson, Mikael
AU - Pilet, Jean Benoit
AU - Rasmussen, Anne
AU - Sterba, Maj Britt
AU - Varone, Frédéric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2024.
PY - 2024/11/4
Y1 - 2024/11/4
N2 - While political scientists regularly engage in spirited theoretical debates about elections and voting behavior, few have noticed that elected politicians also have theories of elections and voting. Here, we investigate politicians’ positions on eight central theoretical debates in the area of elections and voting behavior and compare politicians’ theories to those held by ordinary citizens. Using data from face-to-face interviews with nearly one thousand politicians in 11 countries, together with corresponding surveys of more than twelve thousand citizens, we show that politicians overwhelmingly hold thin, minimalist, “democratic realist” theories of voting, while citizens’ theories are more optimistic and policy oriented. Politicians’ theoretical tendencies—along with their theoretical misalignment from citizens—are remarkably consistent across countries. These theories are likely to have important consequences for how politicians campaign, communicate with the public, think about public policy, and represent their constituents.
AB - While political scientists regularly engage in spirited theoretical debates about elections and voting behavior, few have noticed that elected politicians also have theories of elections and voting. Here, we investigate politicians’ positions on eight central theoretical debates in the area of elections and voting behavior and compare politicians’ theories to those held by ordinary citizens. Using data from face-to-face interviews with nearly one thousand politicians in 11 countries, together with corresponding surveys of more than twelve thousand citizens, we show that politicians overwhelmingly hold thin, minimalist, “democratic realist” theories of voting, while citizens’ theories are more optimistic and policy oriented. Politicians’ theoretical tendencies—along with their theoretical misalignment from citizens—are remarkably consistent across countries. These theories are likely to have important consequences for how politicians campaign, communicate with the public, think about public policy, and represent their constituents.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85209686896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0003055424001060
DO - 10.1017/S0003055424001060
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85209686896
SN - 0003-0554
JO - American Political Science Review
JF - American Political Science Review
ER -