Population measures of subjective wellbeing: How useful are they?

Richard Eckersley*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    31 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article focuses on the contributions and, importantly, the limitations of subjective wellbeing (happiness/satisfaction) measures as indicators of broad population wellbeing and societal functioning. The popular practice of comparing happiness among countries gives a skewed view of how well their people are faring. Charting trends over time in happiness and mental health gives contradictory pictures of population wellbeing; even the responses to different questions within the same survey can yield very different findings. Asking people about their own lives and about social conditions produces contrasting results. These issues challenge the orthodox model of human development, which places Western liberal democracies at its leading edge. According to an alternative, psychosocial-dynamics, model, some, at least, may be societies in decline. Reconciling these views is no simple matter.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-12
    Number of pages12
    JournalSocial Indicators Research
    Volume94
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Population measures of subjective wellbeing: How useful are they?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this