TY - JOUR
T1 - Practices of collective management of copyright on musical works and related rights on audio-video products in China
AU - Li, Zonghui
AU - Cheng, Wenting
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Collective management of copyright on musical works and audio-video products in China had a late start in relation to the global pace. There are currently five collective management organisations (CMOs) in China, with the Musical Copyright Society of China for musical works and the China Audio-Video Copyright Association for audio-video products being the most dominant. This paper identifies three problems in the institutional design of copyright collective management in China: vague standards for jurisdiction, weak regulation of the CMO monopoly, and the quasi-official status of CMOs. It also discusses three controversies in relation to these collective management practices: the controversial standard setting of licensing fees, the lack of transparency in the distribution of licensing fees, and difficulties that CMOs face when undergoing litigation processes. The paper argues that these controversies can be better managed by establishing regulations on abuse of monopoly power by CMOs, the proper use of their quasi-official status, and an improvement in judicial techniques and transparency in governance.
AB - Collective management of copyright on musical works and audio-video products in China had a late start in relation to the global pace. There are currently five collective management organisations (CMOs) in China, with the Musical Copyright Society of China for musical works and the China Audio-Video Copyright Association for audio-video products being the most dominant. This paper identifies three problems in the institutional design of copyright collective management in China: vague standards for jurisdiction, weak regulation of the CMO monopoly, and the quasi-official status of CMOs. It also discusses three controversies in relation to these collective management practices: the controversial standard setting of licensing fees, the lack of transparency in the distribution of licensing fees, and difficulties that CMOs face when undergoing litigation processes. The paper argues that these controversies can be better managed by establishing regulations on abuse of monopoly power by CMOs, the proper use of their quasi-official status, and an improvement in judicial techniques and transparency in governance.
KW - Audio-video products
KW - CMOs
KW - China
KW - Collective management organisations
KW - Copyright collective management
KW - Musical works
KW - Related rights
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940394216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1504/IJIPM.2015.071346
DO - 10.1504/IJIPM.2015.071346
M3 - Article
SN - 1478-9647
VL - 8
SP - 78
EP - 106
JO - International Journal of Intellectual Property Management
JF - International Journal of Intellectual Property Management
IS - 1-2
ER -