Predicting pro-environmental agricultural practices: The social, psychological and contextual influences on land management

Jennifer C. Price*, Zoe Leviston

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

151 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pro-environmental agricultural approaches have been developed, but their uptake has not been sufficient to mitigate environmental degradation. A lack of suitable theoretical frameworks limits research on farmers' environmental behaviours, and there has been little integration of social sciences in the agricultural adoption literature. This paper details a predictive model of pro-environmental agricultural practices, drawing on psychological frameworks: Value-Belief-Norms and Theory of Planned Behaviour. Dry-land farmers in Central New South Wales, Australia (n=422), were surveyed about behaviours deemed to have positive impacts on the environment by local natural resource management authorities. A rigorous measure of complex land management practice is developed in relation to native vegetation, weeds, soil, stock, and perennials. The model was able to predict 52% of the variance in complex behaviour. Contextual factors, values, attitudes, and norms are identified as important predictors. Results suggest skills and abilities, environmental constraints, biospheric values, and a sense of being able to control one's destiny are significant precursors to pro-environmental practices. The NRM policy context and policy implications are discussed. Holistic strategies and social learning processes are identified as beneficial for farmer well-being and environmental outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-78
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume34
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting pro-environmental agricultural practices: The social, psychological and contextual influences on land management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this