TY - JOUR
T1 - Principles for ethical boundary spanning between science, policy and practice
T2 - A guide for knowledge brokers
AU - Cvitanovic, Christopher
AU - Partelow, Stefan
AU - Bednarek, Angela
AU - Cairney, Paul
AU - Pozza, Ramona Dalla
AU - Downe, James
AU - Hilly, Zelda
AU - Hornidge, Anna Katharina
AU - Howden, Mark
AU - Karcher, Denis B.
AU - Kelly, Rachel
AU - Klenk, Nicole
AU - MacKillop, Eleanor
AU - Meadow, Alison
AU - Melbourne-Thomas, Jess
AU - West, Simon
AU - Wyborn, Carina
N1 -
© 2026 The Authors.
PY - 2026/5
Y1 - 2026/5
N2 - Knowledge brokers have emerged as a key mechanism for facilitating knowledge exchange across institutional and epistemic divides to enable more inclusive, informed, and context-sensitive decision-making. However, despite growing recognition about their value and importance, critical gaps remain related to how knowledge brokers operate that hinders their effectiveness and efficiency in practice. One such gap relates to the ethical dimensions of their work, which remain underexplored and lack formal conceptualization. This perspective addresses this gap by examining the overarching ethical challenges knowledge brokers face, and proposing a set of twelve experientially-derived principles to guide more ethically grounded knowledge brokering. For each principle we also outline a suite of practical behaviours, attitudes and actions to support their realisation in practice. In doing so, our goal is to help recognize and engage with the depth of ethical complexity that knowledge brokers must navigate, support those working in these often-invisible roles, and contribute to a broader conversation about how to strengthen the interface of sustainability science, policy and practice. We conclude by calling for greater institutional support, leadership, and a shift toward ‘ethics by design’ approaches that embed ethical reflection and practices in knowledge brokering efforts from the outset.
AB - Knowledge brokers have emerged as a key mechanism for facilitating knowledge exchange across institutional and epistemic divides to enable more inclusive, informed, and context-sensitive decision-making. However, despite growing recognition about their value and importance, critical gaps remain related to how knowledge brokers operate that hinders their effectiveness and efficiency in practice. One such gap relates to the ethical dimensions of their work, which remain underexplored and lack formal conceptualization. This perspective addresses this gap by examining the overarching ethical challenges knowledge brokers face, and proposing a set of twelve experientially-derived principles to guide more ethically grounded knowledge brokering. For each principle we also outline a suite of practical behaviours, attitudes and actions to support their realisation in practice. In doing so, our goal is to help recognize and engage with the depth of ethical complexity that knowledge brokers must navigate, support those working in these often-invisible roles, and contribute to a broader conversation about how to strengthen the interface of sustainability science, policy and practice. We conclude by calling for greater institutional support, leadership, and a shift toward ‘ethics by design’ approaches that embed ethical reflection and practices in knowledge brokering efforts from the outset.
KW - Equity
KW - Ethics
KW - Inclusion
KW - Knowledge brokering
KW - Knowledge exchange
KW - Reflexivity
KW - Sustainability
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034226157
U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104361
DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104361
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105034226157
SN - 1462-9011
VL - 179
JO - Environmental Science and Policy
JF - Environmental Science and Policy
M1 - 104361
ER -