Private Interests and Problem Frames in Social Policy Reform: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analytical Study

Gabrielle Meagher, David Wilkins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper has two aims: to contribute to understanding of the role that private providers in social care markets play in social policy-making, and to present a method that enables systematic identification of themes in large bodies of policy-relevant digitized documents. We pursue these aims through corpus-assisted analysis of submissions by providers (nonprofit, for-profit and professional) to an Australian inquiry into aged care policy in 2010-11. We show how quantitative methods from corpus linguistics can be used to identify themes, at the level of the word, phrase and construction, and outline how this form of analysis can support critical discourse analysis in the qualitative interpretive tradition. Our analysis reveals clear differences in how the three groups frame policy 'problems' and their 'solutions', and that these framings align broadly with their interests. We find evidence of a 'market frame' in the For-profit sub-corpus, an 'advocacy frame' in the Non-profit subcorpus, and a 'professionalism frame' in the Professional sub-corpus. We also find some important commonalities between the provider groups, which raise questions for further research about internal diversity within these groups and about the interaction between regulation, system structure, and organizational interests.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-29
    JournalCritical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Private Interests and Problem Frames in Social Policy Reform: A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analytical Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this