Problematic online behaviors constitute related yet distinct conditions: A cross-sectional study

Stéphanie Baggio*, Maurane Bosson, David Berle, Vladan Starcevic, Olivier Simon, Joël Billieux

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study tested the Spectrum hypothesis of problematic online behaviors (POBs) which posits that POBs (e.g., online gaming, gambling, sexual activities, and social networking) constitute distinct, yet related constructs. To overcome the limitations of previous research, we recruited a representative sample of young men and capitalized on a common assessment approach (Fifth version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM-5] and Eleventh version of the International Classification of Diseases [ICD-11] frameworks). The study was a single-center, observational study with a cross-sectional design (n = 2620). All targeted behaviors were assessed using the proposed criteria of the DSM-5 and the ICD-11. The correlation analysis showed that online activities were weakly correlated (0.01 ≤ r ≤ 0.19), suggesting that when people engage in one specific online activity to a problematic extent, they do not necessarily engage in several online activities in an excessive way. Using a network analysis, we showed that various POBs might reflect distinct constructs. The community detection analysis identified four communities of items corresponding to each POB. Our robust methodology and sampling strategy suggests that the construct of “Internet addiction” could be misleading. This epistemological shift might be necessary to develop adequate clinical care and public health measures to address POBs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108358
Number of pages7
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume160
Early online date28 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Problematic online behaviors constitute related yet distinct conditions: A cross-sectional study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this