Procrastinate revisited

Frank Jackson

doi:10.1111/papq.12051

Procrastinate revisited

Frank Jackson^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

How is what an agent ought to do at time t related to what they ought to do over a period of time that includes t? I revisit an example that sheds light on this question, taking account of issues to do with the agent's intentions and the distinction between subjective (or expective) and objective obligation.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	634-647
Number of pages	14
Journal	Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
Volume	95
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12051
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2014

Access to Document

10.1111/papq.12051

Cite this

@article{bd04677437d14e789cc68b9185ff81fa,

title = "Procrastinate revisited",

abstract = "How is what an agent ought to do at time t related to what they ought to do over a period of time that includes t? I revisit an example that sheds light on this question, taking account of issues to do with the agent's intentions and the distinction between subjective (or expective) and objective obligation.",

author = "Frank Jackson",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2014 The Author. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly {\textcopyright} 2014 University of Southern California and John Wiley \& Sons Ltd.",

year = "2014",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/papq.12051",

language = "English",

volume = "95",

pages = "634--647",

journal = "Pacific Philosophical Quarterly",

issn = "0279-0750",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Procrastinate revisited

AU - Jackson, Frank

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - How is what an agent ought to do at time t related to what they ought to do over a period of time that includes t? I revisit an example that sheds light on this question, taking account of issues to do with the agent's intentions and the distinction between subjective (or expective) and objective obligation.

AB - How is what an agent ought to do at time t related to what they ought to do over a period of time that includes t? I revisit an example that sheds light on this question, taking account of issues to do with the agent's intentions and the distinction between subjective (or expective) and objective obligation.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84961289985

U2 - 10.1111/papq.12051

DO - 10.1111/papq.12051

M3 - Article

SN - 0279-0750

VL - 95

SP - 634

EP - 647

JO - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly

JF - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly

IS - 4

ER -

Procrastinate revisited

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this