Professional learning: lessons for supervision from doctoral examining

Gina Wisker*, Margaret Kiley

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Most research into research supervision practice focuses on functional, collegial or problematic power-related experiences. Work developing the supervisory role concentrates on new supervisors, and on taught development and support programmes. Most literature on academics' professional learning concentrates on learning to be a university teacher and, latterly, a researcher. However, the research supervisor's role is constantly evolving in response to experiences with students, and reflection on this can contribute to professional learning. Initial research suggests examiners learn from examining experiences feeding back into supervisory roles. We argue that being a thesis examiner provides academic staff with opportunities to learn about their own supervisory practices, enhancing their professional learning. Our research reports on examiner perceptions of learning from examining doctoral theses, which can be taken back into supervisory practice, and translated into advice for other supervisors and doctoral students.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)125-138
    Number of pages14
    JournalInternational Journal for Academic Development
    Volume19
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Professional learning: lessons for supervision from doctoral examining'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this