TY - JOUR
T1 - Project Robustness
T2 - Conceptualization, Measurement, and Implications for Decision Making
AU - Zarghami, Seyed Ashkan
N1 - DBLP License: DBLP's bibliographic metadata records provided through http://dblp.org/ are distributed under a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. Although the bibliographic metadata records are provided consistent with CC0 1.0 Dedication, the content described by the metadata records is not. Content may be subject to copyright, rights of privacy, rights of publicity and other restrictions.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this article is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term 'project robustness' based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this article illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate that how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision making in the project management context. This article contributes to the research on decision making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, and transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments.
AB - Recognizing the need for defining and measuring project robustness, the purpose of this article is threefold. First, it attempts to rigorously define the term 'project robustness' based on the key characteristics of a robust project. Second, this paper aims to propose a measure of project robustness that aligns with the new definition. Third, using empirical evidence, this article illustrates how the new measure of robustness can make a difference to decision making in the project appraisal and execution phases. The results of this research highlight that robustness is more than a key property of resilience; rather, it is a multidimensional construct that includes a set of four necessary characteristics (i.e., resistance, stability, recoverability, and goal attainment) deemed vital to tackle disruptions. The results also demonstrate that how a combination of these characteristics can be integrated into decision making in the project management context. This article contributes to the research on decision making by mitigating optimism bias in projects, and transitioning from heuristic to analytic decision making. It achieves this by leveraging the relevant quantitative evidence regarding the disruption and recovery profile of a highly comparable project, thereby avoiding flawed judgments.
KW - Decision-making
KW - disruption
KW - empirically based decision support system
KW - project robustness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186984403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090
DO - 10.1109/TEM.2024.3370090
M3 - Article
SN - 0018-9391
VL - 71
SP - 5757
EP - 5770
JO - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
JF - IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
ER -