TY - JOUR
T1 - Protecting Basic Legal Freedoms
T2 - International Legal Complexes, Accountability Devices, and the Deviant Case of China
AU - Halliday, Terence C.
AU - Zilberstein, Shira
AU - Espeland, Wendy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Annual Reviews Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - With a focus on legal and other organizational actors beyond the state, this article seeks to expand the theory of conditions under which legal occupations will mobilize to fight for basic legal freedoms within states. It elaborates the line of scholarship on legal complexes and political liberalism within states since the 17thcentury. First, we catalog harms that international organizations (IOs) of many kinds seek to protect in the more than 190 states in the world. Second, we elaborate the concept of an international legal complex (ILC) as a collective actor in the global struggle for basic legal freedoms. We illustrate these two steps with new data on China drawn from a wider project. We show what harms mobilize the ILC, international human rights organizations (IHROs) and an international governmental organization, the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC). We focus on accountability devices as tools differentially deployed by the ILC, IOs, and UNHRC in theirefforts to influence the institutionalization of basic legal freedoms, an open civil society, and a moderate state in China. The illustrative case of China provides a framework for research and theory on all other countries.
AB - With a focus on legal and other organizational actors beyond the state, this article seeks to expand the theory of conditions under which legal occupations will mobilize to fight for basic legal freedoms within states. It elaborates the line of scholarship on legal complexes and political liberalism within states since the 17thcentury. First, we catalog harms that international organizations (IOs) of many kinds seek to protect in the more than 190 states in the world. Second, we elaborate the concept of an international legal complex (ILC) as a collective actor in the global struggle for basic legal freedoms. We illustrate these two steps with new data on China drawn from a wider project. We show what harms mobilize the ILC, international human rights organizations (IHROs) and an international governmental organization, the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC). We focus on accountability devices as tools differentially deployed by the ILC, IOs, and UNHRC in theirefforts to influence the institutionalization of basic legal freedoms, an open civil society, and a moderate state in China. The illustrative case of China provides a framework for research and theory on all other countries.
KW - China
KW - accountability devices
KW - basic legal freedoms
KW - international legal complex
KW - lawyers
KW - rights
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117258466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-111620-013613
DO - 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-111620-013613
M3 - Review article
SN - 1550-3585
VL - 17
SP - 159
EP - 180
JO - Annual Review of Law and Social Science
JF - Annual Review of Law and Social Science
ER -