TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychological ownership of nature: A conceptual elaboration and research agenda
AU - Wang, Xiongzhi
AU - Fielding, Kelly
AU - Dean, Angela
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Psychological ownership, i.e., the sense that an object is “mine/ours”, has been adapted from the organisational psychology literature and applied to the environmental sphere to promote individuals' conservation behaviours. However, the concept—“psychological ownership of nature”—requires greater scrutiny to inform its usefulness in human dimensions of conservation. Our paper conceptually explores whether nature could be viable objects for ownership feelings. We theoretically differentiate psychological ownership of nature, with sense/feelings of ownership toward nature being the conceptual core, from other similar concepts like place attachment and connection to nature. We also discuss that psychological ownership of nature may effectively elicit conservation behaviours in individuals with strong anthropocentric worldviews but be less influential for those with high ecocentric beliefs. Psychological ownership of nature might also result in adverse outcomes (e.g., nature exploitation). This paper contributes a conceptual elaboration of psychological ownership of nature and its research agenda in conservation.
AB - Psychological ownership, i.e., the sense that an object is “mine/ours”, has been adapted from the organisational psychology literature and applied to the environmental sphere to promote individuals' conservation behaviours. However, the concept—“psychological ownership of nature”—requires greater scrutiny to inform its usefulness in human dimensions of conservation. Our paper conceptually explores whether nature could be viable objects for ownership feelings. We theoretically differentiate psychological ownership of nature, with sense/feelings of ownership toward nature being the conceptual core, from other similar concepts like place attachment and connection to nature. We also discuss that psychological ownership of nature may effectively elicit conservation behaviours in individuals with strong anthropocentric worldviews but be less influential for those with high ecocentric beliefs. Psychological ownership of nature might also result in adverse outcomes (e.g., nature exploitation). This paper contributes a conceptual elaboration of psychological ownership of nature and its research agenda in conservation.
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109477
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109477
M3 - Article
VL - 267
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
ER -