Psychophysical Evaluation of a Tactile Display Based on Coin Motors

H. Christiaan Stronks*, Daniel J. Parker, Ashley Stacey, Nick Barnes

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Tactile vision substitution devices present visual images as tactile representations on the skin. In this study we have tested the performance of a prototype 96-tactor vibrotactile using a subset of 64 tactors. We have determined the tactile spatial acuity and intensity discrimination in 14 naïve subjects. Spatial acuity was determined using a grating acuity task. Subjects could successfully identify the orientation of horizontal and vertical gratings with an average psychophysical threshold of 120 mm. When diagonal gratings were included in the analysis, the median performance dropped below psychophysical threshold, but was still significantly above chance at gratings of 142 mm wide. Intensity discrimination yielded an average Weber fraction of 0.44, corresponding to 13 discernable “gray levels” in the available dynamic range. Interleaved stimulation of the motors did not significantly affect spatial acuity or intensity discrimination.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1224-1233
    Number of pages10
    JournalArtificial Organs
    Volume42
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

    Cite this