Public attitudes to the regulation of alcohol

IAN McALLISTER*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public support for the regulation of alcohol is central to government policies aimed at reducing consumption. This study uses a nationally representative population survey conducted in 1993 (n = 3500) to examine public support for 11 separate policies designed to reduce alcohol consumption. The results show that the respondents see these 11 policies in terms of three distinct approaches to alcohol regulation: availability (for example, reducing the number of retail outlets); control (for example, stricter enforcement of laws against serving underage customers); and promotion (for example, restricting alcohol advertising on television). There is strong public support for policies that control alcohol use and, with the exception of restricting alcohol sponsorship of sporting events, for moves to curb the promotion of alcohol. However, public opinion is evenly divided on moves to restrict availability, with the single exception of raising the minimum legal drinking age, which attracts majority support. Women, older people, the less educated, immigrants and abstainers or less frequent drinkers are generally most likely to support more restrictions. By state and territory, Tasmaniens are most restrictive in their views, residents of the Northern Territory most liberal. The findings highlight the difficulties that governments will face in restricting the availability of alcohol. [McAllister I. Public attitudes to the regulation of alcohol. Drug Alcohol Rev 1995; 14:179–186] 1995 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-186
Number of pages8
JournalDrug and Alcohol Review
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public attitudes to the regulation of alcohol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this