Public policy and private health insurance: distributional impact on public and private hospital usage.

Agnes E. Walker*, Richard Percival, Linc Thurecht, Jim Pearse

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of recent private health insurance (PHI) reforms, in particular the 30% rebate and Lifetime Health Cover, in terms of their stated aim of reducing the load on public hospitals. METHODS: Combines the use of two new projection models - "Private Health Insurance" (PHI) and "New South Wales Hospitals" that use public and private hospital inpatient data from 1996-97 to 1999-2000, and NSW population and private health insurance coverage statistics. RESULTS: With the PHI reforms 15% fewer individuals would use public hospitals in 2010 than without these reforms (around 18% fewer among the 40% most affluent Australians and 9% among the 40% least affluent). Lower public hospital usage would mainly be due to Lifetime Health Cover. CONCLUSION: If the PHI reforms remain in place, in 2010 a significant proportion of hospital use would be redirected away from the public sector and towards the private sector, with the shift being greatest among better-off Australians.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)305-314
    Number of pages10
    JournalAustralian Health Review
    Volume31
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Public policy and private health insurance: distributional impact on public and private hospital usage.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this