TY - JOUR
T1 - Putting the pieces together
T2 - Integration for forest landscape restoration implementation
AU - Mansourian, Stephanie
AU - Parrotta, John
AU - Balaji, Poorna
AU - Bellwood-Howard, Imogen
AU - Bhasme, Suhas
AU - Bixler, R. Patrick
AU - Boedhihartono, Agni Klintuni
AU - Carmenta, Rachel
AU - Jedd, Theresa
AU - de Jong, Wil
AU - Lake, Frank K.
AU - Latawiec, Agnieszka
AU - Lippe, Melvin
AU - Rai, Nitin D.
AU - Sayer, Jeffrey
AU - Van Dexter, Kristina
AU - Vira, Bhaskar
AU - Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid
AU - Wyborn, Carina
AU - Yang, Anastasia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2020/2/28
Y1 - 2020/2/28
N2 - The concept of forest landscape restoration (FLR) is being widely adopted around the globe by governmental, non-governmental agencies, and the private sector, all of whom see FLR as an approach that contributes to multiple global sustainability goals. Originally, FLR was designed with a clearly integrative dimension across sectors, stakeholders, space and time, and in particular across the natural and social sciences. Yet, in practice, this integration remains a challenge in many FLR efforts. Reflecting this lack of integration are the continued narrow sectoral and disciplinary approaches taken by forest restoration projects, often leading to marginalisation of the most vulnerable populations, including through land dispossessions. This article aims to assess what lessons can be learned from other associated fields of practice for FLR implementation. To do this, 35 scientists came together to review the key literature on these concepts to suggest relevant lessons and guidance for FLR. We explored the following large-scale land use frameworks or approaches: land sparing/land sharing, the landscape approach, agroecology, and socio-ecological systems. Also, to explore enabling conditions to promote integrated decision making, we reviewed the literature on understanding stakeholders and their motivations, tenure and property rights, polycentric governance, and integration of traditional and Western knowledge. We propose lessons and guidance for practitioners and policymakers on ways to improve integration in FLR planning and implementation. Our findings highlight the need for a change in decision-making processes for FLR, better understanding of stakeholder motivations and objectives for FLR, and balancing planning with flexibility to enhance social–ecological resilience.
AB - The concept of forest landscape restoration (FLR) is being widely adopted around the globe by governmental, non-governmental agencies, and the private sector, all of whom see FLR as an approach that contributes to multiple global sustainability goals. Originally, FLR was designed with a clearly integrative dimension across sectors, stakeholders, space and time, and in particular across the natural and social sciences. Yet, in practice, this integration remains a challenge in many FLR efforts. Reflecting this lack of integration are the continued narrow sectoral and disciplinary approaches taken by forest restoration projects, often leading to marginalisation of the most vulnerable populations, including through land dispossessions. This article aims to assess what lessons can be learned from other associated fields of practice for FLR implementation. To do this, 35 scientists came together to review the key literature on these concepts to suggest relevant lessons and guidance for FLR. We explored the following large-scale land use frameworks or approaches: land sparing/land sharing, the landscape approach, agroecology, and socio-ecological systems. Also, to explore enabling conditions to promote integrated decision making, we reviewed the literature on understanding stakeholders and their motivations, tenure and property rights, polycentric governance, and integration of traditional and Western knowledge. We propose lessons and guidance for practitioners and policymakers on ways to improve integration in FLR planning and implementation. Our findings highlight the need for a change in decision-making processes for FLR, better understanding of stakeholder motivations and objectives for FLR, and balancing planning with flexibility to enhance social–ecological resilience.
KW - drivers of deforestation
KW - forest landscape restoration
KW - integration of natural resource management
KW - multi-functional landscapes
KW - traditional knowledge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076314514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ldr.3448
DO - 10.1002/ldr.3448
M3 - Review article
SN - 1085-3278
VL - 31
SP - 419
EP - 429
JO - Land Degradation and Development
JF - Land Degradation and Development
IS - 4
ER -