Abstract
We conjecture that a 'secondary services boom' is primarily responsible for the widespread nature of the gains in employment during Australia's recent 'China boom'. An economy-wide model provides numerical theory for constructing hypotheses, which are tested econometrically. Predictions that include a services expansion and de-industrialisation are tested against pre-boom data and out-of-sample simulations through the boom. The secondary services boom appears clearly in both income and employment, though the effects on manufacturing are ambiguous, with stronger-than-hypothesised observed performance, suggesting that changes in industrial structure and the composition of assistance have favoured surviving manufacturing firms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 20-43 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Australian Economic Review |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying Australia's 'Three-Speed' Boom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver