TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying catastrophic and climate impacted hazards based on local expert opinions
AU - Keighley, Tim
AU - Longden, Thomas
AU - Mathew, Supriya
AU - Trück, Stefan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Quantifying the potential costs of catastrophic and climate impacted hazards is a challenging but important exercise as the occurrence of such events is usually associated with high damage and uncertainty. At the local level, there is often a lack of information on rare extreme events, which means that the available data is not sufficient to fit a distribution and derive parameter values for frequency and severity distributions. This paper discusses the use of local assessments of extreme events and utilises expert elicitation in order to obtain values for distribution parameters that will feed into management decisions with regards to quantifying catastrophic risks. We illustrate a simple approach, where a local expert is required to only specify two percentiles of the loss distribution in order to provide an estimate for the severity distribution of climate impacted hazards. In our approach we use heavy-tailed distributions to capture the severity of events. Our method allows local government decision makers to focus on extreme losses and the tail of the distribution. An illustration of the method is provided utilising an example that quantifies property losses from bushfires for a local area in northern Sydney. We further illustrate how key variables, such as discount rates, assumptions about climatic change and adaptation measures, will impact the estimates of losses.
AB - Quantifying the potential costs of catastrophic and climate impacted hazards is a challenging but important exercise as the occurrence of such events is usually associated with high damage and uncertainty. At the local level, there is often a lack of information on rare extreme events, which means that the available data is not sufficient to fit a distribution and derive parameter values for frequency and severity distributions. This paper discusses the use of local assessments of extreme events and utilises expert elicitation in order to obtain values for distribution parameters that will feed into management decisions with regards to quantifying catastrophic risks. We illustrate a simple approach, where a local expert is required to only specify two percentiles of the loss distribution in order to provide an estimate for the severity distribution of climate impacted hazards. In our approach we use heavy-tailed distributions to capture the severity of events. Our method allows local government decision makers to focus on extreme losses and the tail of the distribution. An illustration of the method is provided utilising an example that quantifies property losses from bushfires for a local area in northern Sydney. We further illustrate how key variables, such as discount rates, assumptions about climatic change and adaptation measures, will impact the estimates of losses.
KW - Catastrophic risks
KW - Climate impacted hazards
KW - Decision making
KW - Environmental management
KW - Expert opinions
KW - Loss distribution approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030671754&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.035
DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.035
M3 - Article
SN - 0301-4797
VL - 205
SP - 262
EP - 273
JO - Journal of Environmental Management
JF - Journal of Environmental Management
ER -