Quartz-dominated Cenozoic gravels in southeastern Australia: where did all the quartz come from?

B. Pillans*, H. Leitch

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Upper Cenozoic fluvial gravels in the Canberra region are quartz-dominated (>95 vol% quartz), whereas modern bedload sediments contain less than 50 vol% quartz and a range of lithologies that broadly reflect the catchment geology. Potential reasons for the compositional difference include changes in catchment geology, sediment transport distance, post-depositional weathering and regolith history. Breakage of unsound clasts during transport does not explain the difference because sediment transport distances in the Cenozoic were similar to today. Post-depositional weathering of less resistant clasts is ruled out because the Cenozoic gravels are clast-supported and preserve original bedding. During much of the Cenozoic, rainfall was significantly higher than the present, and rainforest species were present in the local and regional vegetation. Weathering regimes were likely very different from today, and deep weathering of catchment lithologies may have favoured the supply of quartz-rich gravelly sediment to the river systems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1027-1032
    Number of pages6
    JournalAustralian Journal of Earth Sciences
    Volume64
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Quartz-dominated Cenozoic gravels in southeastern Australia: where did all the quartz come from?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this