R2P and the benefits of norm ambiguity

Luke Glanville, Wesley W. Widmaier

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Scholars from a variety of perspectives stress the importance of norm clarity and precision for the successful establishment, institutionalization and internalization of norms. Norm ambiguity is commonly thought to be an impediment to norm construction and compliance. In this chapter, we argue that norm ambiguity can actually be crucial for facilitating consensus, flexibility and compliance. We identify conditions under which norm ambiguity can be constructive and suggest that consensus around a norm can sometimes best emerge when the norm is initially articulated in ambiguous and flexible terms and then incrementally adjusted over time through a process that we call the “norm feedback loop.” We then show how ambiguity has facilitated the development of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) norm, tracing Rwanda-era debates over humanitarian intervention, Iraq-era backlash over interventionist abuses and Libya-era norm implementation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationConstructing the Responsibility to Protect
    Subtitle of host publicationContestation and Consolidation
    PublisherTaylor and Francis
    Pages50-68
    Number of pages19
    ISBN (Electronic)9781000035681
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'R2P and the benefits of norm ambiguity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this