Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brief Versus Extended Internet Intervention for Problem Drinkers

John A. Cunningham*, Gillian W. Shorter, Michelle Murphy, Vladyslav Kushnir, Jürgen Rehm, Christian S. Hendershot

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: Brief Internet interventions have been shown to reduce alcohol consumption. This trial intended to compare the effects of one such brief intervention to an extended Internet intervention for problem drinkers. Method: Using online advertising, 490 participants, 18 years or older, were recruited and randomized to receive a brief (CheckYourDrinking.net) versus an extended (AlcoholHelpCentre.net) Internet intervention and were followed up at 6, 12, and 24 months. The per protocol primary analysis assessed difference between condition at the 12-month follow-up. Results: The follow-up rate at 12 months was 83.3 %. ANCOVAs of the primary (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT)-C) and secondary outcome variables (drinks in a typical week, highest number of drinks on one occasion—baseline drinking as covariate) revealed no significant (p > 0.05) differences between the interventions. Similarly, combined analyses of the 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up revealed no significant differences between interventions at all time points. Conclusion: The present study does not provide support for the added benefit of an extended Internet intervention for problem drinkers over a brief Internet intervention.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)760-767
    Number of pages8
    JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine
    Volume24
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized Controlled Trial of a Brief Versus Extended Internet Intervention for Problem Drinkers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this