Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries

Kathleen Daly*, Brigitte Bouhours

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    213 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Despite legal reforms, there has been little improvement in police, prosecutor, and court handling of rape and sexual assault. In the past 15 years in Australia, Canada, England and Wales, Scotland, and the United States, victimization surveys show that 14 percent of sexual violence victims report the offense to the police. Of these, 30 percent proceed to prosecution, 20 percent are adjudicated in court, 12.5 percent are convicted of any sexual offense, and 6.5 percent are convicted of the original offense charged. In the past 35 years, average conviction rates have declined from 18 percent to 12.5 percent, although they have not fallen in all countries. Significant country differences are evident in how cases are handled and where in the legal process attrition is most likely. There is some good news: A victim's "good" character and credibility and stranger relations are less important than they once were in police or court outcomes. However, evidence of nonconsent (witness evidence, physical injuries to the victim, suspect's use of a weapon) continues to be important.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCrime and Justice
    PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
    Pages565-650
    Number of pages86
    ISBN (Print)9780226808819
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Publication series

    NameCrime and Justice
    Volume39
    ISSN (Print)0192-3234

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this