Re-examining the 'origins' of the prenominal periphrastic possessive construction Jan z'n boek in Dutch

Jennifer Hendriks*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The dative reanalysis 'origins' explanation for prenominal periphrastic possessive constructions (PPPCs) in Dutch has been maintained for well over a century. This paper brings new evidence to bear on this hypothesis, arguing that while genitive relational case marking on the possessor NP in earlier Dutch PPPCs is clearly attested, we lack evidence that the dative was used in this way. Instead, two types of case marking strategies are in use in earlier Dutch PPPCs - one relational and one concordial - as a solution to case conflict in instances which would otherwise give rise to double case marking. Historical and present-day dialect data from German is also examined to address the common assumption that developments in Dutch PPPCs mirrored those in German. Similar to Dutch, clear evidence attests to genitive relational case marking in earlier German PPPCs.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)28-71
    Number of pages44
    JournalDiachronica
    Volume29
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Re-examining the 'origins' of the prenominal periphrastic possessive construction Jan z'n boek in Dutch'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this