Abstract
Historically, in Australia, gambling policy and regulation have been the sole responsibility of Australian State and Territory governments. However, in 1998-99 the Commonwealth commissioned an unprecedented national inquiry into gambling that was highly critical of existing gambling policies and regulatory regimes. The Productivity Commission proposed a 'blueprint' for an effective, independent gambling regulatory system. Seven years on, this article revisits Australian gambling regulation to present a contextualised account of regulatory reform in Victoria and New South Wales (NSW). It finds that that they have taken a markedly different approach to structural reform. Neither State has adopted the Productivity Commission's 'ideal' regulatory model. Reforms have been shaped by local circumstances and government priorities, rather than the regulatory principles and functions outlined by the Productivity Commission.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 277-300 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2008 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Re-regulating the gambling industry: Regulatory reform in Victoria and New South Wales, 1999-2006'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver