TY - JOUR
T1 - Reading Bourdieu in Casanova
T2 - Field Theory, Illusio, and Habitus
AU - Nulley-Valdés, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Universidad de Granada. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/1/30
Y1 - 2022/1/30
N2 - Pascale Casanova’s world literature theory and methodology developed in The World Republic of Letters draws heavily from Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology. While criticism to date has noted (mostly in a superficial fashion) that Casanova builds explicitly on Bourdieu—for example, that she expands his nationally focused field theory into her ambitious theorisation of world literary space—, how and the extent to which Casanova implicitly draws and develops Bourdieu has not been fully uncovered. This paper analyses the implicit methodological and theoretical elements which Casanova has drawn from Bourdieu, specifically her subtle use and development of concepts such as the literary field, illusio, and habitus, as well as the role of critical reflexivity and epistemological vigilance in research. By reading Bourdieu in Casanova, it is possible to gain both a deeper understanding of Casanova’s theory and methodology by considering these Bourdieusian underpinnings and, at the same time nuance and revise Casanova’s proposal beyond the widespread Manichean critiques of her supposed inherent Gallocentrism.
AB - Pascale Casanova’s world literature theory and methodology developed in The World Republic of Letters draws heavily from Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology. While criticism to date has noted (mostly in a superficial fashion) that Casanova builds explicitly on Bourdieu—for example, that she expands his nationally focused field theory into her ambitious theorisation of world literary space—, how and the extent to which Casanova implicitly draws and develops Bourdieu has not been fully uncovered. This paper analyses the implicit methodological and theoretical elements which Casanova has drawn from Bourdieu, specifically her subtle use and development of concepts such as the literary field, illusio, and habitus, as well as the role of critical reflexivity and epistemological vigilance in research. By reading Bourdieu in Casanova, it is possible to gain both a deeper understanding of Casanova’s theory and methodology by considering these Bourdieusian underpinnings and, at the same time nuance and revise Casanova’s proposal beyond the widespread Manichean critiques of her supposed inherent Gallocentrism.
KW - Pascale Casanova
KW - Pierre Bourdieu
KW - field theory
KW - literary theory
KW - world literature
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135146755&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.30827/tn.v5i1.22865
DO - 10.30827/tn.v5i1.22865
M3 - Article
SN - 2605-2822
VL - 5
SP - 7
EP - 29
JO - Theory Now
JF - Theory Now
IS - 1
ER -