TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals
AU - Dryzek, John S.
AU - Niemeyer, Simon
PY - 2006/7
Y1 - 2006/7
N2 - While consensus is often taken to be the ideal way to secure political legitimacy, a more robust pluralism has many defenders too. We attempt to reconcile arguments for pluralism and consensus. Pluralism ought to be accepted and valued at the simple level of values, beliefs, and preferences. Pluralism at this level can nevertheless coexist with normative, epistemic, andor preference meta-consensus, all of which have qualities that should attract even pluralists. However, close attention must be paid to the content of meta-consensus and the conditions of its production or discovery.
AB - While consensus is often taken to be the ideal way to secure political legitimacy, a more robust pluralism has many defenders too. We attempt to reconcile arguments for pluralism and consensus. Pluralism ought to be accepted and valued at the simple level of values, beliefs, and preferences. Pluralism at this level can nevertheless coexist with normative, epistemic, andor preference meta-consensus, all of which have qualities that should attract even pluralists. However, close attention must be paid to the content of meta-consensus and the conditions of its production or discovery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744726255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00206.x
M3 - Review article
SN - 0092-5853
VL - 50
SP - 634
EP - 649
JO - American Journal of Political Science
JF - American Journal of Political Science
IS - 3
ER -