Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals

John S. Dryzek*, Simon Niemeyer

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    255 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    While consensus is often taken to be the ideal way to secure political legitimacy, a more robust pluralism has many defenders too. We attempt to reconcile arguments for pluralism and consensus. Pluralism ought to be accepted and valued at the simple level of values, beliefs, and preferences. Pluralism at this level can nevertheless coexist with normative, epistemic, andor preference meta-consensus, all of which have qualities that should attract even pluralists. However, close attention must be paid to the content of meta-consensus and the conditions of its production or discovery.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)634-649
    Number of pages16
    JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
    Volume50
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this