TY - JOUR
T1 - Reconnecting Genes, Languages and Material Culture in Island Southeast Asia
T2 - Aphorisms on Geography and History
AU - Denham, Tim
AU - Donohue, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Te Holocene history of Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) is dominated by the 'Out-of-Taiwan' hypothesis and derivatives, such as the spread of the Island Southeast Asian Neolithic. According to these ideas, approximately 4500-4000 years ago, farmer-voyagers from Taiwan migrated southward into ISEA to subsequently acculturate, assimilate or displace pre-existing inhabitants. Tese processes are considered to have produced a consilience between human genetics, Austronesian languages and the archaeological record within ISEA, although recurrent critiques have questioned these putative correspondences. Tese critiques have proposed that each line of evidence should be independently evaluated and considered, rather than assumed to correspond. In this paper, the authors advocate a fuller engagement with and a deeper understanding of the spatial and temporal processes that structure archaeological, genetic and linguistic distributions within Island Southeast Asia. Geography and history are ofen marginalized in discussions of the Holocene history of ISEA, yet both are fundamental to the interpretation and reconciliation of multidisciplinary data within the region. Tese themes are discussed using aphorisms that are designed to be illustrative, namely to promote thought and reflection, rather than to be comprehensive.
AB - Te Holocene history of Island Southeast Asia (ISEA) is dominated by the 'Out-of-Taiwan' hypothesis and derivatives, such as the spread of the Island Southeast Asian Neolithic. According to these ideas, approximately 4500-4000 years ago, farmer-voyagers from Taiwan migrated southward into ISEA to subsequently acculturate, assimilate or displace pre-existing inhabitants. Tese processes are considered to have produced a consilience between human genetics, Austronesian languages and the archaeological record within ISEA, although recurrent critiques have questioned these putative correspondences. Tese critiques have proposed that each line of evidence should be independently evaluated and considered, rather than assumed to correspond. In this paper, the authors advocate a fuller engagement with and a deeper understanding of the spatial and temporal processes that structure archaeological, genetic and linguistic distributions within Island Southeast Asia. Geography and history are ofen marginalized in discussions of the Holocene history of ISEA, yet both are fundamental to the interpretation and reconciliation of multidisciplinary data within the region. Tese themes are discussed using aphorisms that are designed to be illustrative, namely to promote thought and reflection, rather than to be comprehensive.
KW - Archaeology
KW - Areality
KW - Austronesian
KW - Genetics
KW - Island Southeast Asia
KW - Phylogeny
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948763997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/22105832-20120207
DO - 10.1163/22105832-20120207
M3 - Article
SN - 2210-5824
VL - 2
SP - 184
EP - 211
JO - Language Dynamics and Change
JF - Language Dynamics and Change
IS - 2
ER -