Redesigning primary care Provider perspectives on the clinical utility of virtual visits

Jamie K. Fujioka*, Megan Nguyen, Michelle Phung, Onil Bhattacharyya, Leah Kelley, Vess Stamenova, Nike Onabajo, Michael Kidd, Laura Desveaux, Ivy Wong, R. Sacha Bhatia, Payal Agarwal

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective To explore primary care physician (PCP) perspectives on the clinical utility of virtual visits. Design Qualitative design involving semistructured interviews. Setting Primary care practices within 5 regions in southern Ontario. Participants Primary care physicians representing different practice sizes and remuneration models. Methods Interviews were conducted with PCPs who were involved in a large-scale pilot implementation of virtual visits (patient-provider asynchronous messaging, or synchronous audio or video communication). The first phase involved a convenience sample of users in the first 2 regions where the pilot was initiated; after implementation in all 5 regions, purposive sampling was used to ensure diversity within the sample (eg, physicians representing different use frequencies of virtual visits, regions, and remuneration models). Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed. An inductive thematic analysis was used to identify prominent themes and subthemes. Main findings Twenty-six physicians were interviewed. Fifteen were recruited using convenience sampling and 11 through purposive sampling. Four themes regarding the clinical utility of virtual visits were identified: virtual visits can effectively resolve many patient concerns, with some variation in PCP comfort using virtual visits for specific conditions; virtual visits are beneficial for a range of patients but some patients might overuse or inappropriately use them; PCPs prefer to use asynchronous messaging (eg, text or online messaging) because of its convenience and flexibility; and virtual visits can provide value at the patient, provider, and health system levels. Conclusion While participants believed that virtual visits can be appropriately used to resolve a variety of clinical concerns, they found in practice that virtual visits are fundamentally different from face-to-face encounters. Professional guidelines on appropriate use cases should be established to develop a standard framework for virtual care.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)E78-E85
    JournalCanadian Family Physician
    Volume69
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2023

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Redesigning primary care Provider perspectives on the clinical utility of virtual visits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this